ANGELICQUE MCQUEEN AND OSCAR DE LA HOYA HAVE A SON NAMED DEVON...HE WANTS TO TALK TO HIS DAD
5.14.2010
Khan hopes to make name for himself in America - Boxing - Yahoo! Sports
Khan hopes to make name for himself in America - Boxing - Yahoo! Sports
DLHOYABABYMOMMA says... RICHARD SCHAEFER HOPES TO USE OSCARS NAME ALONG WITH HIS (NO RISK TAX IS ONLY ON YOUR RESIDENCE LAW) FOR LEGALLY BANKING OFF THE FANS OF THIS "BRIT BOY" NO NO NO WE KNOW RICHARD BUY LOW AND SELL HIM TO THE MUSLIM GANG... 24 K ? AS OSCAR WAS ONLY A FRACTION OF THAT... 14K ON OSCARS HEAD RIGHT?... OSCARS NOT THAT STUPID... YOU MUST A TOLD HIM HE ACTUALLY WILL GET PART OF THAT MONEY... LIAR
DLHOYABABYMOMMA says... RICHARD SCHAEFER HOPES TO USE OSCARS NAME ALONG WITH HIS (NO RISK TAX IS ONLY ON YOUR RESIDENCE LAW) FOR LEGALLY BANKING OFF THE FANS OF THIS "BRIT BOY" NO NO NO WE KNOW RICHARD BUY LOW AND SELL HIM TO THE MUSLIM GANG... 24 K ? AS OSCAR WAS ONLY A FRACTION OF THAT... 14K ON OSCARS HEAD RIGHT?... OSCARS NOT THAT STUPID... YOU MUST A TOLD HIM HE ACTUALLY WILL GET PART OF THAT MONEY... LIAR
5.13.2010
Am I the only one who gives a fuck?
DLHOYABABYMOMMA says...
I often wonder how much???
How much?
How much must one pay to make a dearly beloved family member turn away to something they know is wrong?
I often think Maybe Oscar would be without anything at all... If not for the the the fraud money laundering scam artist he is...
So should that make me happy that one day our child might ask Satan dick head for a college loan... To be paid back with interest while Richard sits with still fresh ink on his hand He prints the cash... He loans the cash... He wants the cash back He is part of the fed reserve... Never actually seen one huh???
Well boxing fans look no more... Big bad wolf is Richard Schaefer His father Alfred Schaefer BOSS MAN OF GENEVA BANKING and gramps who says boys its been 72 years... its time again... How can one purchase 300 tons of victims golden teeth from the nazi killers
ask richard
I often wonder how much???
How much?
How much must one pay to make a dearly beloved family member turn away to something they know is wrong?
I often think Maybe Oscar would be without anything at all... If not for the the the fraud money laundering scam artist he is...
So should that make me happy that one day our child might ask Satan dick head for a college loan... To be paid back with interest while Richard sits with still fresh ink on his hand He prints the cash... He loans the cash... He wants the cash back He is part of the fed reserve... Never actually seen one huh???
Well boxing fans look no more... Big bad wolf is Richard Schaefer His father Alfred Schaefer BOSS MAN OF GENEVA BANKING and gramps who says boys its been 72 years... its time again... How can one purchase 300 tons of victims golden teeth from the nazi killers
ask richard
carla... the case is in riverside you know orange county hearings are illegal
DLHOYABABYMOMMA says...kiss it... its the cute thing at the bottom of this page
LIMITED ENGAGEMENT AGREEMENT
This Limited Attorney-Client Engagement Contract (the "Agreement") is between the undersigned Angelicque McQueen as the mother and guardian of her minor son Devon Dc La Hoya ("Client") and The Law Office of Carla DiMare, whose business address is P.O. Box 1668, Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067 and 197 Eighth St., No. 702, Boston, MA 02129; tel.: 858-775-0707 (the "Firm").
1. Conditions: This Agreement will not take effect, and the Firm will have no obligation to provide legal services, until Client returns a signed and dated copy of this Agreement.
3. Client's Duties and Responsibilities: Client agrees to always be truthful with Firm, timely and fully cooperate with Firm, keep Finn informed of any developments, abide by this Contract, and to keep Firm advised in writing of Client's address, phone number and whereabouts. Client will timely provide Finn with such factual information and materials as Firm requests and requires to perform its services, and Client will timely pay the bills and make decisions, if any, as are appropriate.
4. Legal Fees, Costs. Retainer and Billing Practices: The Firm will bill client at a reduced rate of $160 an hour. (Finn currently chars and receives $375 an hour). It is the Firm's understanding that the Client's income is limited. The Client will endeavor to pay the bills in full within 14 days of receipt of said bills, but in any event Client agrees to pay no less than $1,000 per month, until all bills, i.e., the costs and fees, are fully paid. In addition, upon signing this agreement. Client agrees to deposit with Firm the initial sum of $2,500 to be applied automatically to pay Fees and Costs incurred on behalf of Client, until exhausted. Client desires that the Firm try to get Finn's legal bills paid by Oscar Dc La Hoya, and if Firm is successful then Mr. Dc La Hoya will be charged Firm's rate of $375 an hour. The aforementioned $2,500 deposit does not represent an estimate of anticipated fees and costs. Firm reserves the right at any time to require that the deposit be replenished within 10 days of notice, email or otherwise, that it must be replenished, or that a new deposit in an amount determined by Finn be made to apply against future Fees and Costs. If Finn does require that the deposit, or other amount, be replenished, then the Client agrees to promptly replenish it within 10 days, and failure to
Page 1 of 3
LIMITED ENGAGEMENT AGREEMENT
This Limited Attorney-Client Engagement Contract (the "Agreement") is between the undersigned Angelicque McQueen as the mother and guardian of her minor son Devon Dc La Hoya ("Client") and The Law Office of Carla DiMare, whose business address is P.O. Box 1668, Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067 and 197 Eighth St., No. 702, Boston, MA 02129; tel.: 858-775-0707 (the "Firm").
1. Conditions: This Agreement will not take effect, and the Firm will have no obligation to provide legal services, until Client returns a signed and dated copy of this Agreement.
2. Scope of Services: Client is hiring the Firm only to represent Client on a limited basis to contact and then negotiate as follows: Devon wants to see his dad, Oscar Dc La Hoya, and spend time with him on a regular basis. In addition, it would be in Devon's best interests if his dad would agree to put enough money away for Devon to attend a four year college, when that time comes. Firm shall contact Scott Weston, Esq., Nachshin & Weston, 11601 Wilshire Blvd., #1500, Los Angeles, CA 90025, tel. 310-478-6868, who represents Oscar Dc La Hoya. After the Firm's aforementioned efforts and upon Oscar Dc La Hoya's response, if the Firm is unable to negotiate a settlement and does not desire to continue representing Client, the Firm shall send written notice to the Client at the address listed below and via e-mail and shall be relieved of all responsibilities related thereto. If the Firm does decide to continue, and the Client desires the Firm to continue, and the Firm desires to amend this agreement, for example by increasing the houfly rate or entering into another agreement, then they may amend this agreement with a letter agreement In other words, this agreement does not obligate the Firm to perform any services beyond the initial written response from Oscar Dc La Hoya, and Client acknowledges this fact. Firm shall provide those legal services reasonably required to represent Client, and shall take reasonable steps to keep Client informed of progress and to respond to Client's inquiries. If the Firm continues with representation beyond the initial demand letter and response period described above, and this matter goes into litigation, then the Finn will represent Client in any court action, if necessary, or until a settlement or judgment, by arbitration or trial, is reached, and in connection with any appropriate post-trial motions. The Finn will not represent Client on any appeal, or any proceeding designed to execute on the judgement, without such additional compensation and a separate Agreement as Firm and Client may agree upon in a separate Agreement. It is understood that Client is not relying on Firm for business, investment or accounting decisions or to investigate the character or credit of persons with whom Client may be dealing, or for any other advice other than as specifically set forth herein. Finn undertakes to render legal services requested by Client and accepted by Finn competently and with professional skill.
3. Client's Duties and Responsibilities: Client agrees to always be truthful with Firm, timely and fully cooperate with Firm, keep Finn informed of any developments, abide by this Contract, and to keep Firm advised in writing of Client's address, phone number and whereabouts. Client will timely provide Finn with such factual information and materials as Firm requests and requires to perform its services, and Client will timely pay the bills and make decisions, if any, as are appropriate.
4. Legal Fees, Costs. Retainer and Billing Practices: The Firm will bill client at a reduced rate of $160 an hour. (Finn currently chars and receives $375 an hour). It is the Firm's understanding that the Client's income is limited. The Client will endeavor to pay the bills in full within 14 days of receipt of said bills, but in any event Client agrees to pay no less than $1,000 per month, until all bills, i.e., the costs and fees, are fully paid. In addition, upon signing this agreement. Client agrees to deposit with Firm the initial sum of $2,500 to be applied automatically to pay Fees and Costs incurred on behalf of Client, until exhausted. Client desires that the Firm try to get Finn's legal bills paid by Oscar Dc La Hoya, and if Firm is successful then Mr. Dc La Hoya will be charged Firm's rate of $375 an hour. The aforementioned $2,500 deposit does not represent an estimate of anticipated fees and costs. Firm reserves the right at any time to require that the deposit be replenished within 10 days of notice, email or otherwise, that it must be replenished, or that a new deposit in an amount determined by Finn be made to apply against future Fees and Costs. If Finn does require that the deposit, or other amount, be replenished, then the Client agrees to promptly replenish it within 10 days, and failure to
Page 1 of 3
DLHOYABABYMOMMA says...love how people have court dates and file shit when you are not even in the state and have no clue its being done...
you would think me not being there would be questionable enough... I CALL THIS THE BIGGEST FU*K OF MY LIFE FU*KED OVER THAT IS>>>
Superior Court of California, County of Riverside
3/03/08 Register of Actions Page:
www.riverside.courts.ca.gov
Case Number RID189111
Case Name ..: DESBROW & DE LA HOYA
Case Type ..: FAMILY LAW Case Status Active
Itegory ...: Establish Parental Relationship
'-jurisdiction: RIVERSIDE
Complaint Type : Establish Parental Relationship Petitioner (s) Respondent(s):
ANGELICQUE DESEROW OSCAR DE LA HOYA
ATTORNEY: AT RNEY:
FREDERICK W DELISIO NACHSHIN & WESTON,
Filed : 1/10/01
Not Served
LLP
Action Description Disposition N/A
Date Declaration Under Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act N/A
1/10/01 Complaint Filed. Summons Issued. Receipt: 010111-0040 $235.00 N/A
010111-0040-CK Reference Number 0201
Petitioner's place of residence Riverside
Family Law Petition and Party Information Entered. N/A
Case Assigned to Commissioner Stuart Glickman in N/A
2/14/01 Department F3. (Commissioner) Complete
Notice printed for DELILAH KNOX RIOS on 1/10/01
Order to Show Cause re ENTER AND ENFORCE STIPULATED JDGT filed by ANGELICQUE DESBROW represented by DELILAH KNOX RIOS (FL-300) Receipt: 010111-0042 $27.00
010111-0042-CK Reference Number 0201
OSC set 2/14/01 at 8:00 in Dept. F3
Hearing re: Order to Show Cause re ENTER AND ENFORCE STIPULATED JDGT filed by ANGELICQUE DESEROW represented by DELILAH KNOX RIOS.
Dept.: F3 Time : 8:00
Honorable Commissioner Jeffrey J Prevost presiding.
Clerk: K. Allen
Court Reporter: None
ANGELICQUE DESEROW not present in court represented by D. Rios.
No appearance by OSCAR DE LA HOYA.
Off the record:
Stipulated Judgment filed
5.11.2010
read about" Alfred Schaefer"...was to meet Oscar for the first time on Set 18 2004
DLHOYABABYMOMMA says...
Despite Switzerland’s famed neutrality, the war hurt the bank by virtually shutting down its international businesses. And while banks in major belligerent countries like the United States and Germany began to recover from the Depression because of wartime economic expansion and their governments’ need for emergency financing, UBS’s performance continued to lag.
Once the war ended, however, so did the bank’s slump. Only a few months after Germany’s defeat in 1945, it acquired Eidgenóssische Bank, a prominent Zurich financial institution. This acquisition pushed UBS’s assets to SFr1 billion and established it as one of Switzerland’s largest banks. UBS also established a presence in the United States for the first time when it opened a representative office in New York in 1946. But the bank’s strategy during the postwar years concentrated on developing its domestic business. It continued to open branches and acquire smaller institutions within Swiss borders throughout the 1950s. By 1962, UBS’s assets had reached SFr7 billion and the bank had 81 branch offices.
In 1965 UBS and other major Swiss banks found themselves unwillingly embroiled in an international controversy when nervous investors sparked a run on the British pound. Swiss banks, through their reputation as the world’s safest money havens, had accumulated substantial deposits in pounds sterling, and it was from them that unwanted pounds were withdrawn for sale on the currency markets. The banks themselves sank $80 million into stopping the panic, but the British were not impressed—Labor Party politicians derisively labeled them “the gnomes of Zurich.” In response, UBS Chairman Alfred Schaefer complained to Time, ”These campaigns really wound us. At times it makes one melancholy.”
UBS underwent a burst of expansion in the late 1960s funded largely by the 1967 acquisition of Interhandel, a Swiss financial company possessing substantial cash holdings from the sale of its majority stake in GAF, the American chemical concern. In 1968 UBS acquired four small domestic savings-and-mortgage banks, strengthening its mortgage-banking operations. In 1969 it diversified into consumer lending, leasing, and factoring through the acquisition of four more domestic financial companies: Banque Orea, Abrí Bank Bern, Aufina Bank, and AKO Bank.
UBS opened its first foreign branch office in 1967 in London. It continued to expand its overseas business in the 1970s, establishing Union Bank of Switzerland Securities Limited in London in 1975 and UBS Securities Incorporated in New York in 1979. Both of these subsidiaries were devoted to gaining a share of foreign underwriting markets.
But UBS has lagged behind its competitors in expanding its foreign operations in the past 20 years, when internationalization has been the watchword of the financial industry all over the world. It was the last of the three largest Swiss banks to establish a branch office in the United States, which it finally did in 1970, in New York. Its foreign securities subsidiaries also remained small compared to those of Swiss Bank Corporation and Credit Suisse. UBS’s caution in testing international waters, however, was a longstanding matter of policy. The bank’s directors still remembered how the sudden termination of foreign business in World War II had delayed its recovery from the Depression, and concentrated instead on building up its domestic business long after its competitors had begun to internationalize.
As a result, UBS began losing what international business it had in the 1980s because its operations were relatively unsophisticated. It was also faced with the fact that it had just about reached the limits of expansion in the domestic banking arena. So in the middle of the decade, it made a fresh assault on the Eurobond market in an attempt to become a leading European underwriter. In February, 1985, UBS surprised Eurobond underwriters when it brought major bond issues worth a total of $850 million for Nestlé, Rockwell, IBM, and Mobil to market at unusually low yields. The low yields were meant to attract corporate customers who liked the prospect of paying lower interest rates on their issues, but left competing underwriters astonished by UBS’s aggressiveness and the high prices that it charged for the bonds. The general manager of a rival bank attributed its approach to the Eurobond market to the influence of the preponderance of Swiss army officers in UBS’s hierarchy. “They make immensely careful preparations before making a move, and then they throw all their power into an advance,” he told Euromoney in 1984.
UBS did not stop there in its late drive to internationalize. Anticipating the 1986 deregulation of Britain’s financial markets, it acquired the London brokerage house Phillips & Drew in 1985. In 1986 it bought the West German bank Deutsche Länderbank, which it renamed Schweizerische Bankgesellschaft, and established a Phillips & Drew office in Tokyo. And in 1987, it opened an Australian merchant-banking subsidiary, UBS Australia Limited.
During the summer of 1987, UBS sought to solidify its position in the London markets with a bid to take over the British merchant banker Hill Samuel. The deal fell through, however, when UBS refused to accept Hill Samuel’s shipbroking and insurance services in the deal along with its core merchant-banking businesses. Rumors circulated that UBS might then go after Kleinwort Benson, a British merchant bank that was reeling at the time from a slump in the bond market and a series of unfortunate acquisitions. As it turned out, however, UBS was having enough trouble digesting Phillips & Drew. The brokerage subsidiary lost £48 million as a result of the October, 1987 stock market crash, but even before then an inadequate settlement system had cost it £15 million when a rush of bull market-inspired orders proved overwhelming. Between April, 1987 and February, 1988, UBS spent a total of £115 million on Phillips & Drew.
Still, UBS seems prepared to stick it out in the British securities market. And back home, it appears to be in little danger of losing its dominant position as one of Switzerland’s three largest banks. The Big Three have a virtual stranglehold on the domestic securities brokerage and underwriting businesses, and they often behave as members of a club rather than competitors. As a syndicate, their power is quite considerable. Despite sentiment emanating from the regulatory Swiss National Bank in 1989 that there should be greater competition in the nation’s financial markets, UBS’s future position seems quite secure.
Principal Subsidiaries
AKAG Anlage-und Kapital-AG (99%); AKO Bank; Argor-Heraeus S.A. (75%); Aufina Leasing & Factoring AG; Banco di Lugano; Bank Aufina; Bank Cantrade Ltd. (85%); Saudi-Swiss Bank (51%); Bank Rohner Ltd. (80.3%); Cantrade Participation Ltd. (85%); Credit Industriel SA; Eidgenossische Bank Beteilgungs-und Finazgesellschaft (99.9%); Intrag Ltd. NZ (85%); Orea Bank Ltd.; Swiss Mortgage and Commercial Bank (99.5%); “Thesaurus” Continental Securities Corporation (99.9%); UBS Finanzholding AG; UBS Phillips & Drew Ltd. (U.K.); Schweizerische Bankgesellschaft (Deutschland) A.G.; UBS Australia Ltd.; Union Bank of Switzerland (Canada); Union Bank of Switzerland Finance N.V. (Netherlands Antilles); Union de Banques Suisses (Luxembourg) S.A.; Union Bank of Switzerland (Panama) Inc.; UBS Asset Management Ltd. (U.K.); Union Bank of Switzerland (Trust and Banking) Ltd. (Japan); Union Bank of Switzerland (U.K.) Ltd.; Union Bank of Switzerland (Underwriters) Ltd. (Bermuda); UBS Finance Inc. (USA); Phillips & Drew International Ltd. (U.K.) (50%).
Cite this article
Pick a style below, and copy the text for your bibliography.
MLA ChicagoAPA "Union Bank of Switzerland." International Directory of Company Histories. 1990. Encyclopedia.com. 11 May. 2010.
"Union Bank of Switzerland." International Directory of Company Histories. 1990. Encyclopedia.com. (May 11, 2010). http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G2-2840600145.html
"Union Bank of Switzerland." International Directory of Company Histories. 1990. Retrieved May 11, 2010 from Encyclopedia.com: http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G2-2840600145.html
Learn more about citation styles
Despite Switzerland’s famed neutrality, the war hurt the bank by virtually shutting down its international businesses. And while banks in major belligerent countries like the United States and Germany began to recover from the Depression because of wartime economic expansion and their governments’ need for emergency financing, UBS’s performance continued to lag.
Once the war ended, however, so did the bank’s slump. Only a few months after Germany’s defeat in 1945, it acquired Eidgenóssische Bank, a prominent Zurich financial institution. This acquisition pushed UBS’s assets to SFr1 billion and established it as one of Switzerland’s largest banks. UBS also established a presence in the United States for the first time when it opened a representative office in New York in 1946. But the bank’s strategy during the postwar years concentrated on developing its domestic business. It continued to open branches and acquire smaller institutions within Swiss borders throughout the 1950s. By 1962, UBS’s assets had reached SFr7 billion and the bank had 81 branch offices.
In 1965 UBS and other major Swiss banks found themselves unwillingly embroiled in an international controversy when nervous investors sparked a run on the British pound. Swiss banks, through their reputation as the world’s safest money havens, had accumulated substantial deposits in pounds sterling, and it was from them that unwanted pounds were withdrawn for sale on the currency markets. The banks themselves sank $80 million into stopping the panic, but the British were not impressed—Labor Party politicians derisively labeled them “the gnomes of Zurich.” In response, UBS Chairman Alfred Schaefer complained to Time, ”These campaigns really wound us. At times it makes one melancholy.”
UBS underwent a burst of expansion in the late 1960s funded largely by the 1967 acquisition of Interhandel, a Swiss financial company possessing substantial cash holdings from the sale of its majority stake in GAF, the American chemical concern. In 1968 UBS acquired four small domestic savings-and-mortgage banks, strengthening its mortgage-banking operations. In 1969 it diversified into consumer lending, leasing, and factoring through the acquisition of four more domestic financial companies: Banque Orea, Abrí Bank Bern, Aufina Bank, and AKO Bank.
UBS opened its first foreign branch office in 1967 in London. It continued to expand its overseas business in the 1970s, establishing Union Bank of Switzerland Securities Limited in London in 1975 and UBS Securities Incorporated in New York in 1979. Both of these subsidiaries were devoted to gaining a share of foreign underwriting markets.
But UBS has lagged behind its competitors in expanding its foreign operations in the past 20 years, when internationalization has been the watchword of the financial industry all over the world. It was the last of the three largest Swiss banks to establish a branch office in the United States, which it finally did in 1970, in New York. Its foreign securities subsidiaries also remained small compared to those of Swiss Bank Corporation and Credit Suisse. UBS’s caution in testing international waters, however, was a longstanding matter of policy. The bank’s directors still remembered how the sudden termination of foreign business in World War II had delayed its recovery from the Depression, and concentrated instead on building up its domestic business long after its competitors had begun to internationalize.
As a result, UBS began losing what international business it had in the 1980s because its operations were relatively unsophisticated. It was also faced with the fact that it had just about reached the limits of expansion in the domestic banking arena. So in the middle of the decade, it made a fresh assault on the Eurobond market in an attempt to become a leading European underwriter. In February, 1985, UBS surprised Eurobond underwriters when it brought major bond issues worth a total of $850 million for Nestlé, Rockwell, IBM, and Mobil to market at unusually low yields. The low yields were meant to attract corporate customers who liked the prospect of paying lower interest rates on their issues, but left competing underwriters astonished by UBS’s aggressiveness and the high prices that it charged for the bonds. The general manager of a rival bank attributed its approach to the Eurobond market to the influence of the preponderance of Swiss army officers in UBS’s hierarchy. “They make immensely careful preparations before making a move, and then they throw all their power into an advance,” he told Euromoney in 1984.
UBS did not stop there in its late drive to internationalize. Anticipating the 1986 deregulation of Britain’s financial markets, it acquired the London brokerage house Phillips & Drew in 1985. In 1986 it bought the West German bank Deutsche Länderbank, which it renamed Schweizerische Bankgesellschaft, and established a Phillips & Drew office in Tokyo. And in 1987, it opened an Australian merchant-banking subsidiary, UBS Australia Limited.
During the summer of 1987, UBS sought to solidify its position in the London markets with a bid to take over the British merchant banker Hill Samuel. The deal fell through, however, when UBS refused to accept Hill Samuel’s shipbroking and insurance services in the deal along with its core merchant-banking businesses. Rumors circulated that UBS might then go after Kleinwort Benson, a British merchant bank that was reeling at the time from a slump in the bond market and a series of unfortunate acquisitions. As it turned out, however, UBS was having enough trouble digesting Phillips & Drew. The brokerage subsidiary lost £48 million as a result of the October, 1987 stock market crash, but even before then an inadequate settlement system had cost it £15 million when a rush of bull market-inspired orders proved overwhelming. Between April, 1987 and February, 1988, UBS spent a total of £115 million on Phillips & Drew.
Still, UBS seems prepared to stick it out in the British securities market. And back home, it appears to be in little danger of losing its dominant position as one of Switzerland’s three largest banks. The Big Three have a virtual stranglehold on the domestic securities brokerage and underwriting businesses, and they often behave as members of a club rather than competitors. As a syndicate, their power is quite considerable. Despite sentiment emanating from the regulatory Swiss National Bank in 1989 that there should be greater competition in the nation’s financial markets, UBS’s future position seems quite secure.
Principal Subsidiaries
AKAG Anlage-und Kapital-AG (99%); AKO Bank; Argor-Heraeus S.A. (75%); Aufina Leasing & Factoring AG; Banco di Lugano; Bank Aufina; Bank Cantrade Ltd. (85%); Saudi-Swiss Bank (51%); Bank Rohner Ltd. (80.3%); Cantrade Participation Ltd. (85%); Credit Industriel SA; Eidgenossische Bank Beteilgungs-und Finazgesellschaft (99.9%); Intrag Ltd. NZ (85%); Orea Bank Ltd.; Swiss Mortgage and Commercial Bank (99.5%); “Thesaurus” Continental Securities Corporation (99.9%); UBS Finanzholding AG; UBS Phillips & Drew Ltd. (U.K.); Schweizerische Bankgesellschaft (Deutschland) A.G.; UBS Australia Ltd.; Union Bank of Switzerland (Canada); Union Bank of Switzerland Finance N.V. (Netherlands Antilles); Union de Banques Suisses (Luxembourg) S.A.; Union Bank of Switzerland (Panama) Inc.; UBS Asset Management Ltd. (U.K.); Union Bank of Switzerland (Trust and Banking) Ltd. (Japan); Union Bank of Switzerland (U.K.) Ltd.; Union Bank of Switzerland (Underwriters) Ltd. (Bermuda); UBS Finance Inc. (USA); Phillips & Drew International Ltd. (U.K.) (50%).
Cite this article
Pick a style below, and copy the text for your bibliography.
MLA ChicagoAPA "Union Bank of Switzerland." International Directory of Company Histories. 1990. Encyclopedia.com. 11 May. 2010
"Union Bank of Switzerland." International Directory of Company Histories. 1990. Encyclopedia.com. (May 11, 2010). http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G2-2840600145.html
"Union Bank of Switzerland." International Directory of Company Histories. 1990. Retrieved May 11, 2010 from Encyclopedia.com: http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G2-2840600145.html
Learn more about citation styles
by Michael Swann on 8 November 2006
DLHOYABABYMOMMA says...
RICHARD SCHAEFER
Richard has been with Oscar for six years and is generally credited with being the architect of Golden Boy’s meteoric success during that brief time. He was born in Bern on October 25, 1961, and was raised in Switzerland.
AFTER AN EDUCATION IN BANKING (AS WELL AS A BA IN PSYCHOLOGY MA IN HYPNOSIS)
After an education in banking, he began his career with Swiss Volksbank, then came to Los Angeles in 1988 with Swiss Bank, (now UBS, the largest bank in Switzerland), and continued to get promotion after promotion until he was named Deputy CEO of Banking Operations in the United States in 1997. He was young, incredibly successful, and destined for a life of comfort and wealth.
(HE WAS SENT TO WORK ON THE INSIDES AND TO PROTECT HIMSELF FROM THE LAWSUITS SURRONDING THE HOLOCAUST SCANDAL... RICHARDS FATHER RELOCATED TO HEAD OF BANKING IN GENEVA...
Richard married his wife Lilia in 1994, and they have three children, ages, 12, 10, and 9.
“It was the smartest thing I’ve ever done,” he says of his marriage. “She’s just fantastic, she really allows me to do what I have to do to build up the business. It’s really important to have someone at home where you know the kids are taken care of.”
"IT WAS THE SMARTEST THING I'VE EVER DONE" LOL REALLY? DIDNT KNOW LOVE HAD A BRAIN...
“She’s just fantastic, she really allows me to do what I have to do to build up the business. SHE STAYS THE FUCK OUT OF MY WAY...IS THAT WANT YOU MEANT TO SAY?
Richard met Oscar in 1995 through Raul Jaimes, Lilia’s nephew and longtime De La Hoya friend, who is now the Vice-President of Boxing Operations for Golden Boy. A few years later, Oscar approached Schaefer to build a business for him and in the year 2000 he left the banking business to make history with De La Hoya, intrigued with the possibilities in the burgeoning Hispanic market with the charismatic De La Hoya as the face of the company.
It was a calculated gamble that has paid off well. Today they operate out of the 12 story headquarters known as the “Golden Boy Building” on Wilshire Boulevard in Los Angeles, enjoying enormous success as a promotional company on the top tier of the industry.
ANSWERING THE ALLEGATIONS
As previously stated, not everyone is convinced of the motives and methods of the Golden Boy operation. Richard Schaefer went on the record to answer his detractors and describe his vision for Golden Boy.
Swann: Are you still promoting Chico Corrales and if so, when is his first fight?
Schaefer: “Well hopefully. We were copied a letter from Gary Shaw where he claims he still has promotional rights for Chico Corrales . A lot of people were copied, short of Jim Lampley and Harold Lederman from HBO just about everyone else that you could think of. But Chico Corrales subsequently responded back to Gary and asked, ‘I was not aware of signing any promotional or Showtime agreement, would you please be so kind as to send me a copy to refresh my recollection?’ And he has not received a copy of that agreement.
“When I saw a copy of that letter, I went on the record saying that, of course, if there is a valid promotional agreement we would, of course, withdraw as Chico Corrales’ promoter because the last thing we want is to interfere with an existing valid contract.
“What is interesting though is that in reference to William Trillo [Pound4pound.com] in the article you called brilliant, which I don’t think is that brilliant because if he had checked with us, which he didn’t, I would have told him.
“Prior to signing Chico Corrales I called Gary Shaw and told him as you know there are a number of promoters trying to retain and sign services for Chico Corrales. We obviously are one of them who are interested, and he [Shaw] acknowledges that. I talked to him and he said, ‘Well, I’m trying to sign him as well.’ Not one time did he say to me that, ‘Hey, I still have a promotional contract and I ask you not to interfere.’ And that obviously is very unfortunate. I asked him, ‘Why didn’t you tell me you had an agreement?’ He said, ‘Well you didn’t ask me directly.’ I said, ‘C’mon, I’m calling you telling you I’m interested in Corrales, you told me you wanted to re-sign him as well, why didn’t you just tell me you had a contract with him?’ He said, ‘I don’t have to tell you anything.’ He told me other things in the conversation that I don’t want to repeat because I respect Gary Shaw and I have nothing against the man.
“[James] Prince, his [Corrales] manager was mentioned as well. Why didn’t Richard call Prince? Well, I did call Prince. As a matter of fact I even negotiated the contract with Prince. Shane Mosley was on the phone, I was on the phone, James Prince was on the phone. James Prince actually asked our attorney to send him a copy of the contract, so he was part of that. Why didn’t he say , ‘Richard we can’t because there’s a valid contract.’ He knew we were going to sign Diego Corrales. There’s a track record on our email. There was no conspiracy that we were trying to take him [Corrales] from another promoter. We checked with the fighter, we checked with the promoter, and we checked with the manager.”
Swann: How about the Pacquiao signing?
Schaefer: “Again, his attorney was there and we negotiated the contract very thoroughly. If Bob Arum feels he wants to sue us, he should. In return I’m asking him [Arum] what your claims are and he sent what he claims they are and there’s nothing to it. So again, it’s other promoters trying to bully their way around, and it just doesn’t fly with us. I believe in the end the truth will always come out. I sleep well at night because I know I’m doing the right thing. Anybody can sue anybody. We’ve gotten sued in the past and, touch wood, we’ve always won.”
Swann: Shouldn’t someone have checked the status of the contracts with Corrales and Pacquiao?
Schaefer: “These are two different cases. Chico Corrales said he didn’t [have an existing contract]. Yes, I think a promoter should look into it and not take the fighter’s word, absolutely.
“In one case we had Manny’s attorney involved and he knew what was signed and not signed. We checked with other people who checked and confirmed that Manny Pacquiao is a promotional free agent, but I’d rather not name those other people . When he [Arum] does go to the lawsuit, people will find out who these people are.
“ As to Diego Corrales, if a fighter asked me [ for a copy of the contract] I would just send it to him and I would send a copy of the Showtime agreement. If they’re signed and they’re done, what is the big mystery? If I signed a deal and I’m still obligated to provide certain services, I’m going to provide those services. We said that even though we checked, if a contract pops up, that’s fine with us , too.”
Swann: How about the charge that Golden Boy cannot develop talent and steal talent from other promoters after they develop them?
Schaefer: “ We develop talent. For example, take Ponce De Leon. We brought him along. He’s world champion now and he’s been on HBO several times. Johhny Gonzales, one of the most talked about , exciting fighters, we brought him along. Israel Vasquez is a guy who has been around, but we brought him into prominence. So is Joan Guzman. We create the opportunities and it’s up to them to deliver. Another guy we brought along from the beginning was Librado Andrade, who is ranked #1 [super middleweight] in the world and is the mandatory to Mikkel Kessler. He was built up on HBO Latino and Telefutura. So there are a number of fighters that we have built up and frankly I don’t know any other promoter who can say they have developed as much talent as we have done in the last few years.
“You know a lot of that is driven from jealousy. When you are successful, it breeds jealousy.”
On Wal-Mart…
Schaefer: “ I must compliment Kathy Duva. At least she is open enough to go public with her feelings. While other people hide and don’t want to be named in public because they’re afraid that it will have consequence and make me out to be that monster.
RICHARD SCHAEFER
Richard has been with Oscar for six years and is generally credited with being the architect of Golden Boy’s meteoric success during that brief time. He was born in Bern on October 25, 1961, and was raised in Switzerland.
AFTER AN EDUCATION IN BANKING (AS WELL AS A BA IN PSYCHOLOGY MA IN HYPNOSIS)
After an education in banking, he began his career with Swiss Volksbank, then came to Los Angeles in 1988 with Swiss Bank, (now UBS, the largest bank in Switzerland), and continued to get promotion after promotion until he was named Deputy CEO of Banking Operations in the United States in 1997. He was young, incredibly successful, and destined for a life of comfort and wealth.
(HE WAS SENT TO WORK ON THE INSIDES AND TO PROTECT HIMSELF FROM THE LAWSUITS SURRONDING THE HOLOCAUST SCANDAL... RICHARDS FATHER RELOCATED TO HEAD OF BANKING IN GENEVA...
Richard married his wife Lilia in 1994, and they have three children, ages, 12, 10, and 9.
“It was the smartest thing I’ve ever done,” he says of his marriage. “She’s just fantastic, she really allows me to do what I have to do to build up the business. It’s really important to have someone at home where you know the kids are taken care of.”
"IT WAS THE SMARTEST THING I'VE EVER DONE" LOL REALLY? DIDNT KNOW LOVE HAD A BRAIN...
“She’s just fantastic, she really allows me to do what I have to do to build up the business. SHE STAYS THE FUCK OUT OF MY WAY...IS THAT WANT YOU MEANT TO SAY?
Richard met Oscar in 1995 through Raul Jaimes, Lilia’s nephew and longtime De La Hoya friend, who is now the Vice-President of Boxing Operations for Golden Boy. A few years later, Oscar approached Schaefer to build a business for him and in the year 2000 he left the banking business to make history with De La Hoya, intrigued with the possibilities in the burgeoning Hispanic market with the charismatic De La Hoya as the face of the company.
It was a calculated gamble that has paid off well. Today they operate out of the 12 story headquarters known as the “Golden Boy Building” on Wilshire Boulevard in Los Angeles, enjoying enormous success as a promotional company on the top tier of the industry.
ANSWERING THE ALLEGATIONS
As previously stated, not everyone is convinced of the motives and methods of the Golden Boy operation. Richard Schaefer went on the record to answer his detractors and describe his vision for Golden Boy.
Swann: Are you still promoting Chico Corrales and if so, when is his first fight?
Schaefer: “Well hopefully. We were copied a letter from Gary Shaw where he claims he still has promotional rights for Chico Corrales . A lot of people were copied, short of Jim Lampley and Harold Lederman from HBO just about everyone else that you could think of. But Chico Corrales subsequently responded back to Gary and asked, ‘I was not aware of signing any promotional or Showtime agreement, would you please be so kind as to send me a copy to refresh my recollection?’ And he has not received a copy of that agreement.
“When I saw a copy of that letter, I went on the record saying that, of course, if there is a valid promotional agreement we would, of course, withdraw as Chico Corrales’ promoter because the last thing we want is to interfere with an existing valid contract.
“What is interesting though is that in reference to William Trillo [Pound4pound.com] in the article you called brilliant, which I don’t think is that brilliant because if he had checked with us, which he didn’t, I would have told him.
“Prior to signing Chico Corrales I called Gary Shaw and told him as you know there are a number of promoters trying to retain and sign services for Chico Corrales. We obviously are one of them who are interested, and he [Shaw] acknowledges that. I talked to him and he said, ‘Well, I’m trying to sign him as well.’ Not one time did he say to me that, ‘Hey, I still have a promotional contract and I ask you not to interfere.’ And that obviously is very unfortunate. I asked him, ‘Why didn’t you tell me you had an agreement?’ He said, ‘Well you didn’t ask me directly.’ I said, ‘C’mon, I’m calling you telling you I’m interested in Corrales, you told me you wanted to re-sign him as well, why didn’t you just tell me you had a contract with him?’ He said, ‘I don’t have to tell you anything.’ He told me other things in the conversation that I don’t want to repeat because I respect Gary Shaw and I have nothing against the man.
“[James] Prince, his [Corrales] manager was mentioned as well. Why didn’t Richard call Prince? Well, I did call Prince. As a matter of fact I even negotiated the contract with Prince. Shane Mosley was on the phone, I was on the phone, James Prince was on the phone. James Prince actually asked our attorney to send him a copy of the contract, so he was part of that. Why didn’t he say , ‘Richard we can’t because there’s a valid contract.’ He knew we were going to sign Diego Corrales. There’s a track record on our email. There was no conspiracy that we were trying to take him [Corrales] from another promoter. We checked with the fighter, we checked with the promoter, and we checked with the manager.”
Swann: How about the Pacquiao signing?
Schaefer: “Again, his attorney was there and we negotiated the contract very thoroughly. If Bob Arum feels he wants to sue us, he should. In return I’m asking him [Arum] what your claims are and he sent what he claims they are and there’s nothing to it. So again, it’s other promoters trying to bully their way around, and it just doesn’t fly with us. I believe in the end the truth will always come out. I sleep well at night because I know I’m doing the right thing. Anybody can sue anybody. We’ve gotten sued in the past and, touch wood, we’ve always won.”
Swann: Shouldn’t someone have checked the status of the contracts with Corrales and Pacquiao?
Schaefer: “These are two different cases. Chico Corrales said he didn’t [have an existing contract]. Yes, I think a promoter should look into it and not take the fighter’s word, absolutely.
“In one case we had Manny’s attorney involved and he knew what was signed and not signed. We checked with other people who checked and confirmed that Manny Pacquiao is a promotional free agent, but I’d rather not name those other people . When he [Arum] does go to the lawsuit, people will find out who these people are.
“ As to Diego Corrales, if a fighter asked me [ for a copy of the contract] I would just send it to him and I would send a copy of the Showtime agreement. If they’re signed and they’re done, what is the big mystery? If I signed a deal and I’m still obligated to provide certain services, I’m going to provide those services. We said that even though we checked, if a contract pops up, that’s fine with us , too.”
Swann: How about the charge that Golden Boy cannot develop talent and steal talent from other promoters after they develop them?
Schaefer: “ We develop talent. For example, take Ponce De Leon. We brought him along. He’s world champion now and he’s been on HBO several times. Johhny Gonzales, one of the most talked about , exciting fighters, we brought him along. Israel Vasquez is a guy who has been around, but we brought him into prominence. So is Joan Guzman. We create the opportunities and it’s up to them to deliver. Another guy we brought along from the beginning was Librado Andrade, who is ranked #1 [super middleweight] in the world and is the mandatory to Mikkel Kessler. He was built up on HBO Latino and Telefutura. So there are a number of fighters that we have built up and frankly I don’t know any other promoter who can say they have developed as much talent as we have done in the last few years.
“You know a lot of that is driven from jealousy. When you are successful, it breeds jealousy.”
On Wal-Mart…
Schaefer: “ I must compliment Kathy Duva. At least she is open enough to go public with her feelings. While other people hide and don’t want to be named in public because they’re afraid that it will have consequence and make me out to be that monster.
Berne Declaration - UBS and Enron: Letter to UBS
Berne Declaration - UBS and Enron: Letter to UBS
DLHOYABABYMOMMA says...
GOLDEN BOY'S CEO RICHARD SCHAEFER
SEVERAL STATEMENTS MADE BY SCHAEFER WITH REGARDS TO UBS AS WELL AS SCHAEFERS PAST AND PRESENT TIES TO THE UBS BANKS
HAVE COME UNDER WAY AS QUESTIONS WITH POSSIBLE LINKS TO ENRON AS WELL AS ARIZONAS RECENT IMMIGRATION LAWS ....
GOLDEN BOY HIMSELF MAY OR MAYBOT BE AWARE OF THE MOON-LIGHTING SKILLS R SCHAEFER HAS OBTAINED BY HIS RECENT (LAST YEAR)
OPENING OF ARMOR CAPITAL/ FINANCIAL INVESTMENT CORP IN GENEVA WITH AN EMPLOYMENT COUNT OF 5
FIVE INCLUDING RICHARD SCHAEFER SEEM TO RUN A MULTI-BILLION CORPORATION IN GENEVA ...
FOR THOSE WHO MAY NOT FOLLOW THE TRENDS OF PRIVATE BANKING... FINANCIAL INVESTMENTS ARMOR CAPITAL SHOULD BE CALLED FORT KNOX B/C MAYWEATHER AND DE LA HOYA'S MONEY IS SOMEWHERE UP IN HERE...
FORT KNOX B/C ONCE THE GIG IS UP... MAYWEATHER AND DE LA HOYA WILL BE THE ONCE WITH TAX FRAUD ON THEIR FOREHEAD WHILE SCHAEFER IS IN GENEVA COUNTING HIS LOOT... OFF LIMITS UNDER THE SWISS PRIVATE BANKING SECRECY LAWS..
DLHOYABABYMOMMA says...
GOLDEN BOY'S CEO RICHARD SCHAEFER
SEVERAL STATEMENTS MADE BY SCHAEFER WITH REGARDS TO UBS AS WELL AS SCHAEFERS PAST AND PRESENT TIES TO THE UBS BANKS
HAVE COME UNDER WAY AS QUESTIONS WITH POSSIBLE LINKS TO ENRON AS WELL AS ARIZONAS RECENT IMMIGRATION LAWS ....
GOLDEN BOY HIMSELF MAY OR MAYBOT BE AWARE OF THE MOON-LIGHTING SKILLS R SCHAEFER HAS OBTAINED BY HIS RECENT (LAST YEAR)
OPENING OF ARMOR CAPITAL/ FINANCIAL INVESTMENT CORP IN GENEVA WITH AN EMPLOYMENT COUNT OF 5
FIVE INCLUDING RICHARD SCHAEFER SEEM TO RUN A MULTI-BILLION CORPORATION IN GENEVA ...
FOR THOSE WHO MAY NOT FOLLOW THE TRENDS OF PRIVATE BANKING... FINANCIAL INVESTMENTS ARMOR CAPITAL SHOULD BE CALLED FORT KNOX B/C MAYWEATHER AND DE LA HOYA'S MONEY IS SOMEWHERE UP IN HERE...
FORT KNOX B/C ONCE THE GIG IS UP... MAYWEATHER AND DE LA HOYA WILL BE THE ONCE WITH TAX FRAUD ON THEIR FOREHEAD WHILE SCHAEFER IS IN GENEVA COUNTING HIS LOOT... OFF LIMITS UNDER THE SWISS PRIVATE BANKING SECRECY LAWS..
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)